AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Ritas lime a rita8/7/2023 ![]() The total cash amount hasn't been disclosed, but according to the proposed settlement, class members can receive a cash payment based on the number and size of Ritas beverages they purchased between Jan. How much is Anheuser-Busch compensating Ritas drinkers? 1, 2018, and July 19, 2022, is eligible to file a claim. Packaging will now contain the phrase "malt beverage" and the Ritas website will also disclose that the product line "does not contain distilled spirits." Who is eligible for a payment from the Bud Light Ritas settlement?Īny adult 21 or over who purchased one or more of the 112 different Ritas beverage options between Jan. In addition to the cash payout, Anheuser-Busch agreed to better inform consumers about the nature of the Ritas line. They maintain they wouldn't have paid as much if they knew what was in the beverages, or might not have bought them at all. "Nowhere on the front, sides, or top panel of the packaging… does state that the products do not have distilled liquor or wine." "Reasonable consumers did not know, and had no reason to know, that the products were, and continue to be, falsely and deceptively packaged," the plaintiffs contend. Anheuser-Busch, despite names like "Lime-a-Rita" and "Straw-ber-Rita" - and advertising that touts its "classic margarita flavor"- the beverages contain no tequila, liquor or wine, "just flavored beers that taste like margaritas, mojitos or wines." In 2012, Anheuser-Busch introduced Bud Light Lime Ritas, a line of 8% alcohol flavored malt beverages available in eight-ounce and 25-ounce cans.Īccording to plaintiffs in Browning, et al., v. 1, 2018, and July 19, 2022, can be compensated as part of the proposed settlement. What is Anheuser-Busch accused of in the Bud Light Rita lawsuit?Īnyone who bought Ritas beverages between Jan. BC563150, Superior Court of California in the County of Los Angeles).įor more information about other class-action lawsuits filed against Anheuser-Busch LLC and ’s coverage of the company, click here.Below, find out if you qualify for a payment from Anheuser-Busch, how much you could get and when checks could start going out.įor more on class action cases, find out if you're eligible for money from Capital One's $190 million payout, T-Mobile's $350 million data breach case or Snapchat's $35 million biometric privacy settlement. November 2014: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Anheuser-Busch for allegedly falsely advertising several flavors of Bud Light Lime-A-Rita malt beverages – including the Lime-A-Rita, Raz-Ber-Rita, Straw-Ber-Rita, Mang-O-Rita, and Apple-Ahhh-Rita – as “light” and low-calorie beverages when they actually contain “significantly more calories and carbohydrates than any other Anheuser-Busch alcoholic beverage.” ( Cruz et al v. concluding that the plaintiffs did not sufficiently allege that the labels at issue could deceive a reasonable consumer.ĭecember 2014: This action was transferred to federal court. ![]() ![]() June 2015: A federal judge dismissed this action When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled. July 2015: The plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal regarding the June 2015 dismissal order. ![]() The appellate court found that reasonable consumers would not be deceived into thinking that Bud Light Lime-a-Rita is a low-calorie, low-carbohydrate beverage because the label makes clear that the beverage is not a “normal beer.” Later in March, plaintiffs filed a petition for en banc review (i.e., a rehearing by all of the judges of the Ninth Circuit, rather than the selected three-judge panel.) March 2017: The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court’s decision to dismiss the lawsuit. April 2017: Plaintiffs’ petition for en banc review was denied. ![]()
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |